Quantcast
Channel: Mistress Roulette's Spin of the Wheel » Sexual Psychology
Viewing all 10 articles
Browse latest View live

Switching Perspective

$
0
0

It started with an otherwise uneventful conversation in the car.

‘You don’t really believe what you wrote in your profile.’ It was abrupt, and my expression completed the portrait of confusion. ‘I don’t?’ I asked him, wondering what had been the impetus for this spontaneous analysis of my profiles on CollarMe and FetLife. ‘You don’t really believe that women are the superior sex, and that all men are secretly submissive.’ He gave me a look. And to a certain degree, we both knew he was right. ‘But where did I say ALL men? And while I’m not a feminist, I don’t deny the argument that every woman has a sense of inner dominance that can be nurtured, just as men are generally denied the opportunity to be submissive.’ Opening the door for me, he shook his head. ‘Yeah, but that’s not what you said.’ I didn’t? Stepping out, I’d made a mental note to give it all a second look as soon as I was able. And for those of you who’ve seen my standard profile, you’ll notice there are a few changes. I feel they were necessary to put forth a more accurate view of who I am, and what I perceive.

How subjectively shaped, are our opinions and perspective, without proper analysis and real-world testing. Being a dominant woman has no doubt drawn many submissive men to me. Are they all? In the heart of every man, is there a little boy begging to submit to a powerful woman? No. Just as there are submissive women, are there dominant men. It has just been my own experience that a large number of the population are submissive. But, again, not everyone, which is why I find the point of clarification worthwhile. All theories need rigorous testing, and every argument a worthy opponent to play devil’s advocate.

In conjunction with my experience that so many unwittingly practise ‘blind BDSM’, (more on that in future blogs and essays), is the closer examination in which I’m now engaging regarding those who identify themselves as ‘switches’. There’s a stigma attached. If you’re a switch man seeking a Domme, you may be leery of being wholly honest with all potential Dommes, which is a disservice to you both, and dooming the prospective relationship to failure. There appear to be two camps of switches; those who find themselves switching only with certain individuals, (that person seems to bring out more of one than the other) or they go through periods of time where they’re feeling more one way as opposed to the other; and those who are really too new to the scene, aren’t quite sure where they fit into it just yet, and are exploring all possibilities. (The latter will likely settle into one category after the explorative phase is completed.) But what of the first group? Let’s look at the first subset more closely; for lack of better definition, to be hereinafter referred to as ‘Selective Switches’. (Oh, dear. My legalese is showing. Sorry about that.)

So. ‘Selective Switches’, which, more often than not, involves an individual predominantly identifying themselves as a Dominant with ‘selective’ submission. Now, what really allows that person to be classified as a switch is the per centage they find themselves topping versus bottoming. My own personal scale caps it at 25%. Should you find yourself doing one behaviour over the other 25% or more of the time versus the other 75%, you’re a switch. Anything less than that, and you’re more accurate to call yourself either a Dominant or a submissive. Personally, I find myself to be submissive less than 25% of the time, (really, if I had to nail down a number, it’d be something like 2%) whereas I’m 98% dominant. It’s a very simple system, and seems to’ve been of some help to those with whom I’ve shared it. While it remains subjective, the ideas behind it are not, and subsequently allow you to find your spot along a universal spectrum.

Many of these selective-type switches are never quite 50%, but they hover securely over the 25% marker. Often-times, their response to my question: ‘Can you count the times you’ve topped / bottomed on one hand?’ (This depends upon which they’re currently identifying themselves to me. I’ll always ask regarding the opposite behaviour). They answer emphatically, ‘Oh, definitely,’ every time. Which, in turn, means they’re also definitely a switch. Sure, the stigma that’s been attached to it in certain circles cause a switch to try and force themselves into one category or the other, which is begging for trouble. Rather than seem ‘a fake’, they’ll simply hide under the guise of what they do most often, which explains the handful of emails I get from ‘Dominants’ speaking quite positively as submissives. The only time I get annoyed is when they argue with my assessement of their being a switch. Oh, but, see — then they’re not a TRUE submissive, they say. So, let’s tackle that next.

Seems to be an issue of personal preference, but a lot of switches have been given an unfair deal. Dommes won’t take on a switch, because he’s not a ‘real’ submissive man. To this, I have to ask: according to whose rules? Unless that man is going to argue and obstruct every attempt that Domme makes to top him, how is he any less genuine a submissive? My fellow Dommes, please, lay off the switches! They may have a better idea and be further along the journey to sexual integration than both of us! I bet you’re wondering if you just read that correctly. Switches being more integrated and having a healthy expression of their sexuality than a Dominant or submissive? That’s right.

Think of the basics. What seems to be the one thing upon which everything else truly rests? That which we return to, time and again as we seek happiness and greater fulfillment? Balance. Equilibrium. Moderation. Which of the sexual typologies, then, is closer to that goal? Yep. The switches. Those that are truly a switch recognise and celebrate their own inner dominance as well as can give the ultimate gift of themselves in submission. They don’t feel worthless, pitiable, seeking to be objectified and humiliated by someone that really means to harm and demean them. They don’t feel as if they are superior to all others, their being is divine, or their opinion and perspective absolute. They are not infallible; they are also not so unworthy that the very space they take up would be better used by someone else. They are, in a word, balanced. Or much closer to achieving it. They are not black, not white, and not a muddied grey. They haven’t simply failed to make up their minds. They’ve made the conscious choice to be both. I applaud them for it. Too many Dominants wrestle with festering rage issues, while scores of submissives suffer from deep-seated inferiority complexes. Both struggle with the subject of esteem: too much, versus too little. Both, conversely, could learn a thing or two from the true switch. Myself included.

While Dominant, I hardly think the world revolves around me, and that I am above all. And I don’t honestly believe those Dommes who claim such things actually believe it themselves, either. More often, they’re the ones dealing with low self-esteem, holding the opposite view of themselves. Pay no attention to the woman behind the curtain; she wants your eyes forward, taking in the grandiosity and severity of her aggressive and colourful illusion. But I’ve never been good at following rules with no basis in reality. It hurts me to know that their truly most powerful need is to hide.


About Mistress Roulette

$
0
0

I am a dominant woman.

I don’t play at it, I don’t simply fantasise about it. I just simply am.

I was the vampyre queene while the other little girls were playing at being faerie princesses. Though I could perform the many arias of Briar Rose to perfection, it was Maleficent’s litany to Prince Phillip on the hopelessness of ‘true love conquering all’ and the delivery of her own power-play that captured my heart. Needless to say, I was always a little bit dark. The many personae in my head as a child, (which led me to believe I was mad before I realised I was actually just a writer) ranged from powerful, dominant women to the seasoned villainness and the experienced seductress. No ingenues, naive faire maidens, or delicate flowers for me. The only princess whom I admired was Leia; I often found myself fantasising about being the one seductress mastermind capable of making even Bond succumb and surrender. (Ridiculously hot kinky sex to follow — and of course, he’d live to fight another day. But his body, his heart, his soul — those would be mine.) But Fleming never made my fantasy come true. Naturally, I never quite gave it up. I kept on writing, kept on dreaming, kept on creating tales of mystery, espionage, suspense, murder, even science-fiction and fantasy — with daring, empowered women and the strong, devoted men who were helplessly under their spell, though powerful in their own right.

Before deciding upon becoming a writer, I spent a good many years as an actress, in theatre, putting my own spin on classic characters and inventing my own. They were oft a bit too controversial, though, and I didn’t much like how the femme fatale was always a villainness. It became evident at a young age to me that confident women, expressive in and proud of their sexuality, who enjoyed the power it had over men were either evil or easy. Please! I set to break that very stereotype in my mid teenage years with very satisfactory results. Drawing many — giving in to none. My willpower was supreme. I wanted you to want me; whether or not you could have me — well, you’d learn soon enough. Of course, it wouldn’t stop you from wanting me.

This led to yet another reinvention of self, bringing another facet to the forefront; something in which I’d dabbled since my youth. Psychology. Namely how it expressed itself abnormally, and mixed with human sexuality. I became fascinated with the criminal mind — how it worked, and why. I studied the darker side of man, breaking it carefully down and applying my findings to my own theories and psychological experiments. I became equally intrigued with the development of pathology, deviance, and how the two were alike and separate. I’d suspected I was kinky. I knew I was dominant. But I’d yet to discover how it really had impacted my psyche — and wouldn’t until much later, how I could help others better understand themselves along their own journey to self-discovery.

After my own trials and tribulations, the many facets of me — the actress, the writer, and the psychologist — culminated in the practise of domination therapy. Submissive men, in their own right, drew something out of me that others did not. At first, I was a bit confused — as the reaction was never necessarily the same. This one brought out the mothering influence, while that one made me very angry and cruel — and another still caused me to feel great affection and a sense of completion. One commonality among them all, however, was that I desperately wanted to help them — share with them my experiences, learn of their own, and be the dominant force in their lives this hidden and disowned aspect of their psyche had been deeply missing.

I’ve been asked — ‘Why Roulette?’ Besides being largely British and French, (a definite contradiction, indeed) Roulette is an accurate depiction of how I am as a Domina. I am a woman of many faces, and it’s through exploring these personae that I become better acquainted with my own needs and desires. To make it a bit easier, I’ve come up with a simple list of the personae most commonly triggered in my dealings with submissive men (as well as others in BDSM). Different people simply bring out different aspects of me. While I cannot guarantee you one over the other, I will take your requests into consideration. But do bear in mind, if you’re deeply craving a good tongue-lashing from the Governess and then Queen is what your peasant-self seems to bring about, you ought to count yourself lucky enough to be worthy of servitude.

Now, just to keep it all fair and balanced, I enjoy a solid conversation ahead of time with any prospective client, so that we may see exactly from where you’re coming, what road you hope to be taking, and how I may best help you get there. Despite whichever personae I choose to engage, I’m still a counselor at heart, and your best interest are paramount to me. You’re in good hands. This is all about power exchange, remember? I appreciate the trust in me that it already took to approach a working relationship, and I won’t be reckless with it. While a professional, I do have genuine concern for the well-being and progress of each of my clients. Perhaps, I’m a bit different that way from other Dommes. I simply know no other way to be. For many men, submission is a precious gift, and I am always appreciative.

Still need more? Fantastic. Look no further than my FAQ. Of course, you can always email me, too.

Men Marry Bitches? Oh, REALLY?

$
0
0

So, my favourite socio-pundit, Blanche Black, is at it again. This time quoting Sherry Argov. You may remember her. She’s the chick who believed so heartily that women love bitches that she wrote a book on it. Zoom. Best-seller. At that point, she realised that love wasn’t enough for the fairer populous. No, no. If that love doesn’t come with a price-tag — typically with diamonds (and don’t get me started on why that in itself is insanity) accompanied by wedding bells, it’s just not bringing it home. Of course, Argov couldn’t stop there, so she presented to the world this past summer her magnum opus: Why Men MARRY Bitches.

Oh, dear, christ. How can I ever hope to express the full extent of my conflict over this?

Because:

A) It’s largely true — and it works.

B) It shouldn’t. It really, really shouldn’t.

See, I’m rather living proof of this, since my mother’s earliest lessons involved manipulating men. I was too young to realise that it was … well, kinda wrong, and that the world didn’t really work that way. (I know. Funny coming from a domme, isn’t it?) The truth is, I don’t believe in either (or any) sex being superior to the other. Both genders have strengths and weaknesses. Really, they fit together quite neatly, once you get past the cosmic joke of all the internal conflict. And even that’s not true in every case. Quite honestly, dominant women and submissive men get on very well in tandem. So long as they both remember to respect and appreciate each other.

But … it doesn’t seal the deal.

Nope.

Sad, that in this day and age, we have to look at tying the knot as a business transaction, but really, isn’t no different from any other sales conversion. You’ve each convinced the other that you’re worth the contractual agreement, because of your fancy advertising or dollars poured into market research, so you sign on the dotted line. It’s true that men don’t marry nice girls. Nope. They marry bitches. They like nice girls. They enjoy nice girls bringing them coffee and sharing their office space. Cleaning up their desk and ensuring that the blinds are open when they come in and closed when they leave. They probably even appreciate those women who take the time and effort to make their lives a little easier, to see that they feel supported, valued, and loved.

But do they seal the deal with a nice women?

Natch.

Negatory.

The second you fall for him, and he gets under your skin, the balance of power changes. I hate to admit it, but the most fulfilling, successful portions of my relationships have been as intricate as a battle plan — where every piece of correspondence was strategic, every word carefully crafted, each response closely evaluated to see whether or not the operation was a success or failure. God, I remember triumphantly proclaiming to my mother my various escapades. How I’d played each of my potential suitors like the fiddle he appeared to be, wrapped him around my finger, twisted him up this way and that, and watched my puppet dance. Whatever I wanted, I could achieve that. Easily. (Once you’ve had to mindfuck a homicial maniac, trust me, your average male between the ages of 25 and 35 is child’s play.)

I also found myself creating my own masterpiece: a lengthy, multi-volume fictional tale of a woman (or was it really the man that was the focus?) that begun in childhood where the two met, and for the first time, she’d encountered someone as brilliant as she was — as clever, as fearless, as manipulative, as wise. And, lo, and behold …

I’d plopped down in the Great Room with my mother, at home one weekend from the university where I received my Psych BA, exhausted from the some 5K words I’d just written in a mad flurry. ‘Doesn’t it get old?’ I’d asked her, still deliciously enthralled with my creation; mildly jealous of my protagonist who would eventually get to live happily ever after with him — after a lot of hell, naturally. (I am a mystery writer, after all.) She set down her tea and stared at me, blankly for the moment. ‘Old?’ I explained myself: never meeting a man that could really keep up. Always beating him at his own game. ‘Yes, they’re wonderful for taking you places, and doing favours for you, and being there if you need … satisfaction,’ I sighed. ‘But what would it be like if you couldn’t just control him? If he was as swift as you are, confident in his own right, and … oh, I don’t know. What if you could share the power?’

She laughed. ‘Sweetheart, there’s no such thing. The woman always has the power. Always. Whether or not he knows it. And trust me, most of the time, he doesn’t have a clue. They never did.’

I was dissatisfied with her answer, sighed to myself, and dreamed of men like Dr Penderan Fauste. He satiated me for a long time, actually. I wrote some of the best things I probably ever will in that particular series. He also kept me strong and complete throughout the long years I decided to (subconsciously) really stick it to my mother and found the most terrible, arrogant (and for no good reason), spiteful, cruel, unambitious, vile creature that ever walked the earth. (In my personal experience.) And, since I was recently done with my college education, moved in with him — so that I wouldn’t burden my parents.

Trying to control him was a full-time job. Maybe a part of me even enjoyed some of it. Oh, God, how I despised him. I never felt guilty for my anger toward him, either, because he was truly abusive toward me, and almost always unprovoked. What a change he was from my ex-fiance! Here, I wanted a man that was willful, domineering, and wouldn’t be pushed around. And, holy fuck, did I get it. Even minor things like doing the dishes or ensuring that the carpets were vacuumed was ripe for major conflict. Every time we got into the car together, after the fourth — and soon to be final — year of misery, was the advent of another war. He never paid for anything, expected me to swathe him with gratitude for the mere usage of the furniture he had, and bitched and moaned whenever I didn’t want to fuck him. Which was 90% of our relationship.

It actually gave mutual friends, with whom I still acquaint myself, the idea that I was a cold fish and incapable of sexual passion with zero prowess. For awhile there, I think Mister P was under that same impression, but I never can tell for sure. Sometimes, I get the sense that he knew under my mousy and unassuming exterior was a dominant and sadistic woman secretly dreaming of letting it all go; other times, I don’t think any of it even crossed his mind. He gives me mixed reports, depending upon when I’ve asked him, or at what point we’ve reached in our relationship. So, who knows? The truth is, that relationship, despite its volatility, abuse, and overall misery was not sexless. True to being my mother’s daughter, I’d found other ways with which to satisfy myself — other men that I could entice, ensnare, and use for my own pleasure.

(I know. I’ve come a long way, haven’t I?)

To that end, I’d often-times write with them — sexy, D/s filled fantasy-oriented collaborative stories — which was, I guess, like some kind of cyber-sex to the nth degree — but minus the present arousal. That would always come later, and be saved for all posterity. One particular writer I knew adored me, and while he was so very sweet, a wonderful friend, and will always be dear to me, he never really did it for me — you know? But another one — the one I’d recruited from another collaborative story group — he was just the right mix of asshole and charmer.

Shit, I thought I was kinda in … something. It couldn’t be love, but it was an intense sort of sexually-charged affinity. The ambiguous platonic of which I’d become an expert after my teen years. I always knew which ones were secretly in love with me, and which were just friends. (Odd but true, there were much more of the former than the latter.) It was with him that I truly got to let off the steam that unbearably built up after I’d realised I was developing a crush on my coworker — Mister P. Who, for the record, could not be more indifferent to me. He was stand-offish — but helpful, abrasive — but friendly. (Yeah, talk about your mixed signals!) But really, it was more confusing because the more important actions said, ‘I care about you.’ The more minor ones — his daily manner, his behaviour — even his words, all screamed: ‘Who are you?’ or ‘You’re really annoying me.’ Hell, at the end of most days, I was just as perplexed as the character I wrote with my favourite co-writer. I’d never knew until later, however, the insights I’d draw from that very same thing.

After a thoroughly enjoyable, but altogether confusing, day at the office, I’d return home to the pity party / abuse and drama factory, put on my headphones, some of my best writing music, and go to town, losing myself in the world I’d created because, at that point, fantasy trumped reality in spades. My co-writer and I would converse outside of our work, of course, and soon, it became just as rife with mixed signals as my daily grind with Mister P. I couldn’t tell if he liked me, hated me, was secretly into me, or couldn’t care less about me. Depending upon the day, or the situation, his words conveyed a little bit of everything. His actions, like Mister P’s, were always aligned. He was prompt, respectful of my time, committed, and reliable.

Then came the day he opened up to me. It was like hell fucking froze over. (I couldn’t get Mister P to do that. Believe me, I’d tried. He walled me off — successfully — and barred me from any private thoughts or insight into his inner life. I was rejected — and dejected — at first, but I was able to channel my fury, confusion, and sadness into my writing. And, damn, to this day, it’s some of the best. Honestly felt.) Then came the truth: about how I meant something to him. He just didn’t know how to express it. And the talks about women. And the roundabout admittance of, ‘so, what if you didn’t have your boy-toy?’ (Note: this would continue even into the near-present. In his eyes, anyone in my life who is not him is clearly a ‘boy-toy’ given what he knows about my ability to manipulate the male mind and body.) Then, I was enamoured. I mean, despite my commitment to my ‘relationship’ — which I never, ever stepped out of, thank you — I do have scruples — I was really, really into him, too.

… Right?

Or was I into the character he was writing? … The character that I’d originally mapped out and created, that had quite the eerie resemblance to … Mister P.

Shit, fuck, and damn.

There really weren’t two ways around it. But which was safer? Confess to my co-worker that I really didn’t know how I felt about him, only to surely be pat on the head, told ‘how cute’ and have my entire feminine ego crushed in a single blow — at which I point, I would’ve just gotten angry and even. Or, skip the whole thing and continue this rich and fulfilling fantasy life with a guy miles and miles away who’s really attractive, but a teensy bit young for me, (listen, after being with a man 2 years your junior and enduring that train-wreck — anything beyond that feels ‘too young’ — regardless of how legal or otherwise normal it may be) which served double-duty to allow me to indirectly contemplate and evaluate the complex dynamic I had with someone else entirely. Obviously, I chose Option B.

The most gratifying sex I’d ever had in my abusive relationship were the times I’d written a particularly kinky scene with my co-writer only to be so fucking hot that I really did need to just use someone until I came. At which point, I could promptly return to writing. It was an okay — if not mind-numbing — existence. At least outside of the moments of genuine pleasure and happiness — which were precious and few, to say the least. I was discovering a real compatibility with my co-writer, which only served to complicate everything. It always got me thinking back to Mister P, since their similarities were peculiar, to put it mildly.

Of course, once I started to take the template of the characters we were writing, things … got even weirder. (They never actually experienced any of this wondrous kinky erotic fun, by the way — at least not to the point where they could remember any of it; that’s the whole point of stringing the audience — or readership — along. It also meant we got to write it over, and over, and over again. In so many ways. Which I didn’t mind!) See, if I looked at everything logically, read the internal motivations of his character, I came to see that his word were almost a complete contradiction of his actions. His character would be saying how silly and annoying my character’s behaviour was, while his thoughts ran to the … tender. Affectionate. I dare say, loving. While he never once indicated to her how he really felt — how much he cared, needed, desired, and admired her — he thought it the entire time!

Okay, big effing deal. But you’ve got to remember I’m a writer. I think in terms of character, plot — motivation. I ask myself: why does someone do what they’re doing? What’s the point? What’s their agenda? What do they hope to achieve? Seeing that he actually loved her, despite all of his statements and minor behavioural evidence to the total contrary was a kind of epiphany for me. Oh, I knew that people can mask their intentions. They do it all the time. But for some reason, when it comes to matters of the heart, I tend to think in more surface terms. Writers tend to do this, too. If they’re going to have two characters hook up, they always give you — the reader, or audience — outward, obvious indications of that happening.

Did anyone ever think for a minute that Mulder didn’t want to bone Scully from day one?

Yeah. I rest my case.

That’s because, be it the talent of Duchovny or the skill of the writers who were responsible for creating that fantastic character, we all had enough hints that they so wanted each other. And Carter (the guy shouting, ‘I made this!’ at the end of every episode — because he did) was going to make us wait. Nine bloody long seasons. And one movie, apparently. But most of us hung on. Why? Because we knew it was going to happen. There’d been enough evidence that, while maybe the character acted dumb, they were just waiting for the opportune moment — that the writers would decide they could finally do the horizontal mambo.

And, oh, how we cheered.

But life’s not like that. If there had been a convenient voice-over attached to all of my dealings with Mister P a few years ago — besides being incredibly odd, and auditory hallucinations — I might’ve had a clue that he was going the way of my dear character. At least part of the time. (Again, I’ll never know the per centage on that. Even now, it keeps changing.)

This was not a line of thinking I wanted to explore. Because he was different than the other men I’d known. I didn’t exactly know why, or what the fuck was wrong with me that I would still find myself thinking of him even after months of purposefully breaking contact. (Which led to many futile attempts to write something to fully express my inner turmoil, often accompanied by Chris Isaak’s ‘Wicked Game’ — sung by many talented cover artists.) It was best to just stick to fantasy and quit entertaining the possibility that just because that’s how it was shaping up in fiction, that that was the way it really was in reality. That world was only gonna break my heart.

The truth was, he’d tapped into something even I had forgotten in my years of trying to learn who the fuck I was, and what was really up with men and women. I’d controlled and dominated oh-so-many boyfriends. (Yawn.) I’d finally found one that was such a supreme asshole, hated me and everything I was so intensely, that he would rather die than see me be happy. (Yikes.) And, to that day, there’d only been one guy that I’d known who I couldn’t really control, who proved that I could enjoy sex, and it could be playful and suspenseful and fun, and yet, was gentlemanly, generous …

… and completely fucked, since his father had fairly recently died, and couldn’t have a real relationship at that point if his life depended on it. We’d been such good friends for years, and fuck, I fell hard. He was my first masochist, and I’ll never forget the delicious hours spent filing my nails to a razor-sharp point while listening ‘Supervixen’ before our weekend would begin.

And then he left. Broke all contact, because, well, technically, I had been taking a break from the pussy man I’d been with for the past couple of years. He was kinda committing, and kinda not, and — did I mention a total pussy? Oh, he was sweet (at least then) to be sure, but he was also putty in my hands. Been there, done that. So, so many times. When my dreamy masochist came along, and decided he wanted me all to himself, and I had to do the fucking honourable thing and decide to stay with my pussy-boyfriend because he’d been so loyal to me … Sigh. Let’s just say I sacrificed my own happiness.

It wasn’t until Mister P that I’d even thought that that sort of feeling, that kind of man, was in existence. And it was so much more than that. Somehow, he touched upon everything deeply buried in my psyche. All the archetypes of all the men I’d put to the page and longed after in my adolescence and early twenties. He was, in every literal sense, the man of my most private and dearest imaginings. My ideal version of  a man. Brilliant — insanely brilliant; genius level brilliant. Attractive — with amazing eyes. A strong build — capable, but not muscle-bound, and certainly not wiry. Able to dress well, but most of the time, just not giving a rat’s ass — but with excellent hygiene. An incredible smile. And an off-the-wall, borderline crass, on the edge of obscenely arrogant, but always crowd-pleasing sense of humour. A natural comic — complete with timing.

It was like I’d taken all of my favourite traits — from characters I’d admired, or created myself — listed them, and sent them to someone and said: ‘Here, make this.’ And there he was. And I didn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell.

Oddly enough, I firmly maintained that belief — all the way up to the point when he first kissed me. And, to my amusement, entertained the same thoughts that my character had in that fictitious works: he was drunk, he didn’t mean it; don’t get too caught up in this. I’d never had any thing like that happen in my life. Hell, I didn’t think it was possible. The guy that you somehow can’t get out of your head, for whatever reason, does not just reappear in your life, soon as you’ve left the asshole and gotten back on your own feet. Well, not outside of the latest spec-script for a rom-com. (Fuck. I’m turning Angeleno, yes, I’m turning Angeleno — I really think so. People really talk like that. I don’t, typically, but after awhile, augh, it seeps into your head.) In fact, it’d been so long that all of my denial had congealed into a strange form of truly violent hatred. I’d always thought that, had I ever had the weird happenstance of running into him somewhere, that I’d punch him square in the jaw.

I know. Punch a guy 6’3″, who’s a brown-belt in Judo … in the jaw. When you’re 5′ 3″ — maybe 5’5″ in stilettos. I didn’t say my anger was logical, or even sane. And it certainly wouldn’t take into account logistics. Yet, I think deep down somewhere, I knew he’d never hit me back. But he probably would do a great job of blocking me — despite how quick I can be on my feet — maybe even restraining me for the moment, the portrait of calm, asking me what the fuck did I think I was doing — his blood pressure not rising a numeral.

And then what? That’s where my brain would stick — and then rewind on itself, and get back to this part about … uhh … where he would stop me, and maybe restrain me for a moment, at which point, I was going, ‘What the fuck?’ That wasn’t the way I rolled. I was in charge. I was in control. But what about those moments when I wasn’t? When I’d lost it completely because of the rage I know of which I’m capable? What then? How could it be that what, deep down, I really needed, was a man who would save me from myself? Well, and doing damage to him.

Naturally, he knew I’d never been in the submissive role before, so we started out that way. And, given the nature of how my mind had been working then, it felt … well … natural. Until it didn’t. He was right — and honest — when he proclaimed I was the world’s worst submissive. It made me so upset! I’d wanted so much to be his faithful and loyal little … whateverthefuck. And … do … uhh …

Okay, so maybe I am the world’s worst submissive. But that’s okay, because he’s not the world’s most natural dominant. Of course, if you want him to top you, he’ll gladly oblige. I think he even enjoys it in some respects. But that’s because he’s eager to please; looking to satisfy. If that actually involves picking up the crop, okay, he’s happy to serve.

Funny how that works out, isn’t it?

So, fast forward to the here and now. Argov’s article proclaims that men want confident women who know themselves and where they’re going. Well, that‘s a no shit. I’m not sure when ‘confident’ became synonymous with ‘bitch’, but, okay. We’ll just go with it. Just as women want a confident man who will give of themselves completely and fully, men want a confident woman. Awesome. But, wait — that’s not what the research (Argov claims to be sound) states.

She says that men marry bitches.

Let’s break it down. Men — which means, not pussies; marry — as in get hitched to, okay; bitches — in this case, dominant, powerful, arrogant, and self-serving women.

Huh.

I guess it’s a theory worth testing, except that it seems to go against everything I’ve done thus far. Of course, I’m almost 30, and have yet to actually wear anything on my left ring finger for longer than 6 months. And men certainly do love bitches — or, if you want to get more specific — submissive men certainly do love dominant women. Trouble that I’ve seen is that …

… they don’t love them back.

Period.

It’s sad. Pathetically, so. While a man’s with a loving, beautiful, caring and sensitive woman, he’s secretly in love with a controlling, manipulative, cunning bitch. And you know why I know this is true?

BECAUSE ARCHIE MARRIES VERONICA.

Click the link if you don’t get it. You soon will. Even comics have failed reality — or, they’re a frighteningly accurate portrait of it. What do men value the most? What do women want? If both men and women want a confident mate, then there should be a lot more dynamic, power-brokering couples out there. Except, there aren’t.

Instead, there are a lot of henpecked, cuckolded, emasculated men who are bending over backwards for their controlling, manipulative, self-entitled, luxury-loving wives. Are they great in the sack? Maybe. Perhaps, the true way to a man’s heart is his cock. Maybe once you put a ring on it, he’ll adorn your finger, too. What drives submissive men to crave, fall in love with, and be perpetually drawn to, bitchy, horrible women? Their need to be used, abused, and discarded? They’re sort of going about it correctly by trying to get it all in one place — marry a bitch and you don’t have to pay a domme.

But is that safe?

Is that sane?

Maybe it doesn’t have to be — because it’s consensual. Whatever these master manipulators did to wind up shuffling all accountability off of their shoulders and getting a free pass to controlling their subservient husbands, I’ll never know, because it’s never been a philosophy to which I’ve subscribed.

But maybe, if I ever hope to ‘seal the deal’, I’m going to have to. Or I could just continue to be a good and decent human being and hope for the best.

(Hah. Yeah, right.)

Please. Please, please, please, tell me that after all this time, Mother did not know best?

I Only Have Eyes For You … Not!

$
0
0

Think your man wants to fuck you and only you? That no matter how devoted to you, how submissive he is, how much of a true slave he is to you, that yours is the only pussy he wants?

Think again.

So, it’s been an interesting day, to say the least. After a particularly insightful discussion with an old friend about a surprisingly common problem, Mister P and I decided to Podcast on the timeless battle of the sexes; more specifically, sexuality.

His take on it is not something with which I’ve been unfamiliar — but no less find troubling. See, he always wants a new partner. Regardless of what’s going on around him, if there’s new pussy to be had, by God, he wants it! He says all men are oriented this way due to pure biology. Now, the reasons why he doesn’t go out and fulfill those apparently natural drives and instincts is due to the consequences it would involve.

Women, on the other hand, don’t crave strange cock — most of the time. We can be satisfied with the cock we know gets the job done; especially if it happens to be attached to a dear friend of ours, and someone we have a great affection for. This doesn’t factor in with men, and quite frankly, they don’t get this about us. Meanwhile, the knowledge that they’re always imagining and desiring a new sex partner — which, quite obviously, isn’t you anymore — is hardly comforting.

I hate to say it, but it really, really does remind me of one of my favourite romantic comedies. (Not to spoil it for anyone, because it really is worth the watch, but it turns out that men and women are not so easily defined, and men are not always on the constant search for ‘new cow’ — just, watch the film to get the reference.)

So, what Mister P is telling me is that it’s true. After they’ve had us once — just once — and the thrill of the new conquest has abated, a part of them is off and running to the next. Upon just a single sexual encounter, he’s already bored of fucking you.

Charming.

Naturally, I asked him: ‘if there’s no guarantee then, that a man will not just up and fuck up and fulfill his constant need for strange one day, then wouldn’t it make sense that the only way it could be guaranteed is if his woman locks his cock up?’

He blinked for a moment, and then responded (almost hesitantly): ‘ … Yes.’

‘Interesting.’

And there you have it. The battle of the sexes rages on, and the next Podcast episode will be our latest contribution to the eternal war. We haven’t even begun it, and I can already tell you, it’s gonna be one to remember.

By the way … anyone have any suggestions for good, comfortable, solid and reliable chastity devices? I may be in the market for one very soon.

Check back for the next Podcast episode.

More Healthy Versus Unhealthy Kink

$
0
0

Wow, another one already.

This one from another guy off CollarMe, asking a pretty common question: are masochistic fantasies healthy? Especially, those in which one desires to be hurt, captured, or forced to submit? It’s a very long, individualised answer — which I rather hinted at in my brief response:

‘Great question, [name given].

Submission exists in many forms — and is as individualised as we are. The key is to understand what’s triggering the ‘submissive fantasies’. It may be a negative or abusive situation from your youth; or, conversely, you may have never experienced anything like that and be secretly curious about it. Sure, you know it’s an awful thing — to be harmed, made to suffer, and experience fear. Consciously, that is. Subconscious is a whole other ball-game, and it plays by very different rules.

Not sure how much you read from my profile, but I’m a psychosexual therapist, so this sort of speculation is my stock and trade. I’m always evaluating the presence or absence of ‘healthy’ versus ‘unhealthy’ kink — namely, that which has presented itself to you based upon negative conditioning from the past through abuse, etc. (unhealthy) from the stuff we fantasise about which comes to us from a place of curiosity about and fascination with the unknown (healthy). My favourite thing to (at least attempt) to do is transform a negatively conditioned ‘unhealthy’ kink into a positive kink experience in a safe, controlled environment. Takes work, but it’s certainly worth it.

I have a number of episodes about this very topic throughout my Podcast on iTunes, ‘Diary of a Dominatrix’. Take your pick, really, or browse the various posting through my website. It’s a hot topic; so hot, actually, that the DSM-V is actually taking such things into account regarding their ‘sexual perversions’ sections. About bloody time, too.

Hope this helps; best of luck to you.

-M Roulette Chatelaine’

What are your thoughts? Experiences? Any you’d like to share?

Let’s Talk About Sex (Part I)

$
0
0

Sex.

Man. The power it holds over us human beings is pretty phenomenal, isn’t it? While it has a greater physical impact upon men, it has an equally emotional one on the fairer sex (and, of course, some men as well). So the intensity, and the need, is quite equivalent, but expressed very differently — and with enough overlap to create the dance between the sexes we all know well. The truth is, there’s a lot of research that says we’re basically serial monogamists as a species; while some of us can certainly hack forever, we may not be expected to do so consistently.

And, yep, that means just what you think it does: when she’d rather read, and you’d like to … erm, ‘make use’ of your own ‘reading material’ — it doesn’t mean the honeymoon’s over completely and eternally — but the infatuation is. While it’s a rather sad thing to mourn, and I’m happier in general knowing that my fiance’s orgasms are under my control, these blips on the sex-dar are pretty normal — and very human.

Once you’ve come to accept that, what the hell do you do? It’s tricky, honestly, because what I’m about to tell you proves a real test for most couples, and explains a good portion of the rising divorce rate over the last 30 years. When both partners decide against ‘forcing’ the sexual chemistry back into their relationship, they tend to ‘let each other be’ — sometimes entering a no-sex spiral that lasts for months. Or years. What began, ‘Not tonight, honey. I really want / need / have to X, Y, or Z,’ became a lower expectation of sexual interest, which then became a decreased need, and the forming of a habit and entirely different dimension of the prior sexual relationship. This is typically how, and why, couples that were once engaging in a healthy, active sexual relationship have managed to dry up and go celibate for years.

So, what the fuck happened? A number of things. Habits are tough to break, and a respite does not equal a permanent sexual lull. There are a lot of dependent factors, but also some ways to avoid the major pitfalls — if you know what to look for and have genuine compatibility.

Hmm. Speaking of lulls and genuine compatibility, my fiance’s getting home soon. While I feel this is no doubt a very important post to be making, I think it’ll have to wait.

Keep your eyes peeled. And in the meanwhile, ask questions. You know I love those.

Control

$
0
0

As some of you know, I love to sing. Occasionally, I’ll share some of them with my Podcast listeners, but I try to keep that pretty strictly about D/s — or, if someone requests — my artistic projects. (I’ve not forgotten you, Arnaut!)

But every now and again, something comes along that magically incorporates everything. Ladies and gents, Laura Branigan’s 1984 ‘banned-in-Boston’ music video, ‘Self Control’.

Okay, yeah, so, I know what you’re thinking: is that the Phantom of the Opera? Why is he here? And, OH, MY GOD, DID HE JUST … ?

Yes. Yes, he did. (And for you lazy asses who have NO idea what’s going on there, WATCH THE FRICKIN’ VIDEO.)

For those curious, this video actually predates the ALW ‘Phantom of the Opera’ Broadway musical by two years. And, oh, my God, the D/s overtones in this — hell, forget overtones — the D/s in this thing …

I now officially blame this video for my being what I call a submissive fetishist. The fact I used to theatrically perform this song all over the house in which I was born shortly after it started coming on the radio does have me scratching my head, and yet, I did. Practically obsessed with the damned thing. So much so that my mother had to remind me that the dining room table was not a stage. (I was a spirited child.)

But for those of you who’ve seen the video, now we can discuss it. I don’t exactly know what the hell is going on in it, to be honest, but my best whack at understanding yields this: the narrator (played by Branigan), is basically this woman who’s very at home with a dark atmosphere; hence the, ‘living among the creatures of the night’. (Why she ‘[hasn't] got the will to try and fight’, we’ll come to later.) She’s not a damsel in distress, or even remotely girly-girl. She’s a strong-willed woman, who becomes fascinated by this strange Phantom-like guy lurking in the shadows around her and her friends, in their night-life, darker world of dancing and a degree of debauchery. He shows up, and she resists him at first until … 4:00 into the song. (I swear, this image is going to be nightmare fuel for awhile.)

Gah. Just … gah.

So, we can hardly blame Branigan’s ‘OH,MYGOD-WHATTHEFUCK?’ look, when he suddenly grabs her hair and shoves her down onto the couch.

You heard me. (Uhh, read me. Whatever.)

… and from there … yeah. Our Christine-like-figure becomes the self-aware, assured, shadow-integrated narrator we meet at the beginning. (Kind of. Time’s doing some funky things in this video. There’s some definite continuity quibbles.)

(And don’t ask what the heap of blue-faced dead-looking people are doing in the corner watching her, erm, ‘transformation’. I don’t know. Or why they appear to be dead, or just … blue.)

And, as we pan back off the dead-blue-people, we get Branigan in a slightly compromised, (but very relaxed) sprawl upon the floor (but in her robe, tied) as red-handed (is that supposed to be metaphoric for something?) Phantom dude, (fully clothed mind; even in shoes — and masque), walks toward the window and, just before he makes to spread the curtains … disappears. Yup. Poof.

Branigan is left with this sort of dazed look as daylight starts filling the room, before doing this strange almost resigned, and yet … undeniably sensual, sort of move where she picks herself up off of the floor and wanders off to turn off a lamp.

But then we cut to her in bed with him next to her — masque and all. And we end on a doll. That … appears to be winking at us. Kinda.

… The fuck?

Who knows what‘s going on in this video. Except that the imagery makes it very clear.

And, yeah. I used to think that only Mister P was severely altered by something from pop culture at a young age. The oldest I could’ve been when I became obsessed with this song was six.

First fucking grade.

At least this helps a lot of the weirder, fucked-up things about my personality make some sense. Especially certain themes in my writing.

Dear God.

Your thoughts? I know you have to have some. How did this song and video affect you? Did it?

P.S. For shits-and-giggles, the whole reason for this post — and revelation — is the fact that Branigan was the ‘featured artist’ on the karaoke website I frequent, and I chose to do ‘Self Control’. Off-the-cuff, no rehearsing, just for the fun of it.

Q&A #1 – Do Women Actually Enjoy Dominating Men?

$
0
0

 

This one comes from my YouTube channel where I’ll often receive questions on a variety of subjects relating to femdom. Sadly, I can’t often get to them in any sort of reasonable time-frame, so I’ve taken to answering them here and sending a link to the individual making the enquiry. So. Onward.

This comes from Germanic, Lovecraftian, ‘satanic murder artist’ ( — I don’t make this shit up) Stein und Stahl Productions:

Hi there. I saw some of your videos and I just wanted to ask you, do any women actually enjoy dominating men, or is this all just for entertainment? Based on all of my experiences, and what I’ve read, it seems like most females are naturally submissive. That’s not to say that there are no exceptions, but it’s hard to believe women would like using your type of therapy or want to stay with their man after dominating him.

Please don’t take this as flamebait, as I’m honestly curious about this and am willing to admit that I’m still learning about the female psyche. I guess what I’m most curious about is, how many women actually get aroused, or in anyway enjoy, dominating a man? Please write back, thanks. ‘

Good question, actually. (I appreciated the clarification that he wasn’t looking to start a flame war, too. It’s hard to tell sometimes.)

 

 

The truth of the matter is, while there are indeed stereotypes – and they do exist for a reason – there are of course exceptions. In general, it’s true that I, too, have found most women to be sexually submissively oriented. That’s not to say I don’t have some genuine domina sisters out there – but they are rare.

It’s been both my experience and observation that sexuality is fluid in both men and women – especially orientation. Women typically aren’t into the honking mass of muscle and machismo that’s represented in bodice-rippers, and men respect women who will gladly show them how the cow ate the cabbage. But, bear in mind, there are many factors involved as to how – or why – someone will be oriented a particular way: childhood background and parental / familial modelling, personal experiences past pubescence (early dating and courtship rituals – first and second-hand) role models outside of the family, culture, heritage, and level of guilt.

Yes. Level of guilt. For example, my husband and I were determining that a surefire sign of kink in someone’s makeup is if they come from a culture that killed a fuck-tonne of people. Yes, I’m completely serious. (Japanese? Kinky as all get out. Germans? Yeah. No more need be said!) So, cultural guilt does seem to factor surprisingly heavily into whether or not someone’s going to be something of a freak. Of course, not always. Beware of making your strokes too broad.

So while it seems sociologically sound to state that women – in general – tend to lean to the submissive, that’s not always the case. You’d be surprised how many men secretly long for a relationship with a dominant women. And, yes – culture counts. You’re much more likely to get your wish if you’re from an African-American or Hispanic background – where machismo and bravado are just for show. The leading ladies of these gentlemen are required to be strong maternal figures who can hold their own. If not … problems occur: domestic violence, for instance, as resentment becomes an issue – quickly.

But, I digress.

The question was: do any women genuinely enjoy dominating men – and the answer to that is a resounding ‘yes!’

Those of us that are truly dominant in nature – small in number as we may be – very much enjoy the opportunity to top and rule our men – and sometimes feel angry and trapped without it. Really. I may not spend every moment of every day (who does?) dreaming of devious things to do to my husband; but if I didn’t have that option, I’d be deeply depressed – and repressed. I know this, as I’ve been there in previous relationships.

Bottom line: know your kink and don’t repress it. It always re-emerges at a later date, and with serious consequences if you’ve not allowed yourself any room to explore it with your chosen partner in your current lifestyle.

In summation – yep, there are us dominant women and sexual sadists out there. We’re just not the majority, and it takes being a particular type of man to gain our attention. Sadly for those lost subby boys out there – that’s the last way to our hearts. Just like submissive women, we want a strong man who can hold his own and won’t be a pussy. We like a challenge, deep down. A man to call us out on our bullshit. Why? Because it’s even more special and legitimate when he’s willing to lay down his masculinity and be our ‘bitch’. Yeah, it may seem somewhat fucked up – but that’s a rather rare kind of love which I’ve found to be especially binding.

I wish you the best of luck in whatever journey you’re currently on.

And, as always, if you’ve a particular question that you’re burning to ask, there are multiple ways to contact me, as well as to enquire into working with me.

 


BDS&Marriage Episode#1: Introductory Cuckolding 101

$
0
0

Allen, (Fetlife user akm3) long-time ‘DoaD’ podcast listener, joins us to kick off the rebranded ‘BDS&Marriage’.

Among the highlights, the former Mistress Roulette (actually Aubianne) struggles with a complicated predicament: having feelings for a man that’s been in her life for several years – and isn’t her husband, Mr P / Preston.

She also recalls her first experiences with what can be argued as polyamoury, but seems more akin to accidental cuckoldry; specifically, her college relationships.


Subscribe via iTunes
Download this Podcast

BDS&Marriage Episode #4: What to Expect When Your Wife Loves Another Man

Viewing all 10 articles
Browse latest View live